File #: 14-A-040    Version: Name:
Type: Deputation Status: Received
File created: 4/2/2014 In control: City Council
On agenda: 4/7/2014 Final action: 4/7/2014
Title: DEPUTATION BY ROMAN GARACH REGARDING MOTION 14-G-078, OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL TO RESIDENTIAL AND AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING BY-LAW FROM EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL (I-E) TO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DETACHED THIRD DENSITY (R3), AND RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DETACHED THIRD DENSITY SPECIAL PROVISION (R3) (SP) AT 40 PRINGLE DRIVE (WARD 5). Mr. Roman Garach provided a deputation in opposition to motion 14-G-078 regarding an Official Plan Amendment from Educational Institutional to Residential and Amendment to the Zoning By-law from Education Institutional (I-E) to Residential Single Detached Third Density (R3), and Residential Single Detached Third Density Special Provision (R3) (Sp) at 40 Pringle Drive (Ward 5). He indicated that he felt that the change from one lot with a special provision to seven lots with special provisions was a substantial change from the application presented at the Public Meeting. Mr. Garach questioned the calculation of the walkway and the resultin...
Attachments: 1. 140407 DEP - Roman Garach - 40 Pringle Drive.pdf
Title
Deputation by Roman Garach regarding motion 14-G-078, Official Plan Amendment from Educational Institutional to Residential and Amendment to the Zoning By-law from Education Institutional (I-E) to Residential Single Detached Third Density (R3), and Residential Single Detached Third Density Special Provision (R3) (SP) at 40 Pringle Drive (Ward 5).
 
Mr. Roman Garach provided a deputation in opposition to motion 14-G-078 regarding an Official Plan Amendment from Educational Institutional to Residential and Amendment to the Zoning By-law from Education Institutional (I-E) to Residential Single Detached Third Density (R3), and Residential Single Detached Third Density Special Provision (R3) (Sp) at 40 Pringle Drive (Ward 5).  He indicated that he felt that the change from one lot with a special provision to seven lots with special provisions was a substantial change from the application presented at the Public Meeting.  Mr. Garach questioned the calculation of the walkway and the resulting impact on the lot frontages that were the subject of the special provisions.  He stated that he believed that these matters represented a significant change to the application and should have been addressed by General Committee.  Mr. Garach noted he felt that the residents were not represented appropriately in this matter.  He expressed concerns regarding the potential impact of intensification.
 
Members of Council asked questions related to matters raised during the deputation and received responses from staff.